NDA & Settlement Agreement Advice

Since November 2024, harassment NDAs are void unless strict conditions are met — including independent legal advice your employer pays for.

For decades, the standard ending of an Irish harassment complaint was a settlement with a silence clause — drafted by the employer’s lawyers, priced by the employer’s lawyers, signed under pressure. The law ended that model on 20 November 2024: confidentiality now belongs to the employee to choose, not the employer to impose — and the statute enforces the difference with voidness.

The New Architecture

NDAs covering allegations of discrimination, harassment, sexual harassment or victimisation (or the employer’s response) are void — unless they arise from WRC mediation, or qualify as an excepted NDA: requested by the employee; preceded by independent legal advice in writing, at the employer’s reasonable cost; clear in language; unlimited in duration only if the employee chooses; withdrawable in a 14-day cooling-off; and preserving disclosure to the listed persons — Gardaí, your solicitor, your doctors and mental-health professionals, Revenue, the Ombudsman, union officials. No settlement can lawfully separate you from those conversations. The full statutory context: the 2024 rules explained.

The Advice the Act Requires — Done Properly

The statutory advice requirement is this practice’s core service, and we treat it as the Act intends: a genuine review, not a rubber stamp. That means the whole agreement examined — the sum against the claims being released (with the WRC clocks mapped, because they keep running while you consider); the wording of any confidentiality against the statutory conditions; the reference, the taxation-of-settlement questions routed to your accountant; the preserved disclosures verified; and the prior question the new law finally makes real: whether you want confidentiality at all. Where the underlying situation deserves more than the offer reflects, that honest assessment is part of the advice — a settlement reviewed is sometimes a settlement renegotiated. And where the offer follows a protected disclosure rather than (or as well as) harassment, the whistleblowing dimension gets its own analysis: exits offered mid-penalisation are drafted for the other side’s reasons.

Time limits in these cases are short, strict, and depend on your exact circumstances — WRC complaints generally run on months, civil claims on years, and important extensions exist, particularly for survivors of abuse. Never assume you are out of time, and never assume you have time: take advice promptly. Nothing on this page is legal advice for your situation.

An Agreement in Front of You?

Sign nothing yet. The advice the Act requires - at your employer's reasonable cost where it applies - reviews everything, not just the silence clause.

Call 01 5827148

Related Reading

NDAs & Settlements - FAQs

From 20 November 2024, non-disclosure provisions are void where they would prevent an employee disclosing allegations of discrimination, harassment, sexual harassment or victimisation (or the employer’s response to them) - with two exceptions: settlement terms arising from WRC mediation, and the “excepted NDA”, which is only valid where the employee themselves requested it and strict statutory conditions are met. The era of silence as a standard settlement term is legally over; confidentiality now belongs to the employee to choose, not the employer to impose.